FIRM BROCHURE/
Are you interested in receiving our full color brochure including service area descriptions and industries served?
RACHLIN NEWSLETTER/
Sign up here to stay in touch and get the latest firm news, industry news and upcoming events.
 
Newsletter - Summer 2007

Tax Positions at Risk
David Brooks, Principal, Assurance Services
Message from the Managing Partner
Rethinking IRS Notices
Avoiding Criminal Tax Prosecution
Tax Positions at Risk
Kids in Distress
Helping Teens Cope with a Pressure-Packed World

Print This Edition
RachlinNews Summer 2007 Summer 2007
What happens when the IRS, SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) share a common vision about how uncertain income tax positions should be disclosed in financial statements? For one, tax directors of large public companies begin evaluating whether they have properly accounted for and disclosed tax positions in their income tax returns and financial statements.

A new accounting pronouncement, known as FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, is requiring companies to evaluate income tax related "gray" areas-tax rules and regulations subject to interpretation or judgment. If a company determines that an examination would more likely than not result in an unfavorable outcome, it must quantify the amount of exposure and recognize additional expense and liability in its financial statements.

Designed to provide information to financial statement users, FIN 48 has created significant controversy and uncertainty. The new reporting standard is far reaching and applies to privately held companies and not-for-profit entities that prepare financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). FIN 48 is generally applicable to audited, reviewed or compiled financial statements for years beginning after December 15, 2006.

While not without controversy, one benefit of FIN 48 is that it should provide non-tax executives of a private company with a clear picture of the company's overall tax exposure. With a clear understanding of exposure, executives should be better able to monitor and reduce exposure areas. For example, if a tax position is dependent on transactions being handled and documented in a certain manner, the FIN 48 analysis could help improve the internal policies and procedures needed to help support the tax treatment.


In adopting FIN 48, privately held companies need to review positions they have taken or plan to take in federal, state and local income tax filings, including decisions not to file returns in certain jurisdictions and other tax issues related to foreign jurisdictions. They should identify any positions that, based on technical merit, would more likely than not result in an unfavorable outcome.

Not-for-profit companies will have to assess their tax positions as well, determining if there is any exposure to unrelated business income, or whether there are any events that could potentially jeopardize their tax-exempt status.

Incorrect or unduly aggressive tax positions that are not likely to withstand IRS scrutiny require the company to reduce its current net income by the taxes, interest and penalties associated with the uncertain tax position. Tax positions that are more likely than not to withstand an IRS audit, but nevertheless represent some degree of uncertainty, may result in a partial charge to the company's income.

The charge to net income may not necessarily be a concern to a privately held company, but what should be of concern is how the IRS or other taxing authority will approach and use the information associated with the tax analysis. The IRS is not tipping its hand on its approach to FIN 48 documentation, however, the IRS has formally stated that it is training its agents on FIN 48 and accounting for income taxes.

In adopting FIN 48, a company will have to analyze the income tax returns for all jurisdictions in which the statute of limitations remains open. The company will also have to document the tax position related to significant acquisitions and dispositions for open tax years. Other areas that require analysis include results of prior tax examinations, timing differences between reporting of book and tax items, prior year financial statements and trial balances and the company's prior period accounting for income taxes.

Without question, FIN 48 will significantly change the manner in which companies account for uncertainty in income taxes. In many instances, these requirements will result in these uncertainties being highlighted in the financial statement in the form of additional disclosure and recognition.

The evaluation and implementation of all provisions of FIN 48 will require significant involvement by various tax and accounting professionals. Early attention to FIN 48 is essential for the timely and efficient completion of financial statements. And, it could provide the added benefit of reversing a potentially uncertain tax position.

© 2008 Rachlin LLP. All Rights Reserved. | info@rachlin.com | Privacy Policy | Legal Statement | Site Map    
Accounting Services